12 questions · Shuffled order · Progress saved locally when available
Identify the evidence for each answer and the specific flaw in its nearest competitor. Complete the four written drills in the lesson before this practice set. Question numbers follow the shuffled order; Guide question labels match the lesson references.
Guide question labels stay the same when the order changes. Check answers when you are ready to review.
Saved on this browser and device; clearing browser data removes progress.
The drill
Your practice is saved on this device.
Question 5
Guide question 1.05
Foundation
The apparent similarity between the two artifacts has misled several observers.
Which word is the simple subject of the main clause?
Why this answer
Simple subject
Correct choice: similarity
'Similarity' names what has misled the observers. The complete subject is 'the apparent similarity between the two artifacts.'
A: 'Artifacts' belongs to the prepositional phrase describing the similarity.
C: 'Observers' is the central noun in the object: the people who were misled.
D: 'Apparent' is an adjective modifying 'similarity,' not a noun serving as the subject.
If you missed it: Ask 'What has misled the observers?' rather than choosing the noun nearest the verb.
The assumption that a pigment's present appearance faithfully reflects its original color ignores the possibility that chemical reactions, rather than deliberate choices by the artist, account for the contrast between the painted figures.
Which statement best expresses the sentence's main claim?
Why this answer
Main claim beneath embedded content
Correct choice: An assumption about original color overlooks a possible chemical explanation for the contrast.
The main structure is 'the assumption ignores the possibility.' The two embedded clauses explain the assumption and the overlooked alternative.
B: This treats the criticized assumption as a conclusion the sentence endorses.
C: The sentence presents chemical reactions as a possibility, not a proven or universal cause.
D: No intention to create later chemical changes is stated.
If you missed it: Separate what the assumption says from what the sentence says about that assumption.
The engineer who inspected the beams that support the balcony concluded that replacing the railing would not address the weakness in the structure.
Which verb anchors the main clause?
Why this answer
Nested relative clauses
Correct choice: concluded
The main subject-verb pair is 'the engineer concluded.' Everything between those words describes the engineer and the beams; the final clause states the conclusion.
A: 'Inspected' belongs to the relative clause modifying 'engineer.'
B: 'Support' belongs to a second relative clause modifying 'beams.'
D: 'Address' occurs in the embedded conclusion and follows the modal 'would.'
If you missed it: Read the nested description outward: beams support; engineer inspected; engineer concluded.
That the archive contains no letters written during the composer's final winter does not demonstrate that the composer stopped corresponding; documents from that period may simply have been lost.
Which idea serves as the subject of 'does not demonstrate'?
Why this answer
Clause-sized subject and negation
Correct choice: The archive contains no letters written during the composer's final winter.
The opening 'that' clause packages the archive's lack of letters as the subject. The sentence says this absence does not prove correspondence stopped.
A: This belongs to the second independent clause and offers a possible explanation.
C: This is the conclusion that the lack of letters fails to demonstrate.
D: The sentence does not assert that such letters certainly existed; it presents possible loss.
If you missed it: Replace the entire opening clause with 'this absence,' keeping 'does not demonstrate.'
Although the new index captures changes in rental prices more promptly than the annual survey does, the committee that commissioned it cautions that movements in the index should not be treated as evidence of changes in the cost of all housing.
Which version preserves the main clause's message while removing the opening concession and the description of the committee?
Why this answer
Main clause versus concession
Correct choice: The committee cautions that movements in the index should not be treated as evidence of changes in the cost of all housing.
The main subject is 'the committee,' and its main verb is 'cautions.' The final content clause gives the caution, including its essential negation and distinction between rentals and all housing.
A: This preserves the opening concession but omits the main caution.
B: This reverses the opening statement and substitutes a different conclusion.
C: This drops the caution and expands the index's coverage beyond what the sentence supports.
If you missed it: Preserve the main subject, main verb, and content needed to understand the stated warning.